Following Obama's national ad buy, this is a good risky move on her part.

Per the Tallahassee Democrat newspaper
Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho is predicting huge voter turnout in Leon County.

"It's clearly of historic proportions," said Sancho, the Tallahassee-based voting chief who has been a prominent statewide critic of elections procedures for 18 years. "It's going to be a high turnout."

Sancho is expecting turnout of about 70 percent, including early voters. He said that is more in line with general elections than primaries.

What's behind it?

"The polls indicate Americans think the country is going in the wrong direction," Sancho said. "Americans realize more than ever they have to get involved to change their country."

Relevant to the delegate count?  Maybe, maybe not, at the end of the day.  The same media that loves to print unadulterated WH spin in the name of giving "both sides of the story" seems oddly reticent to even note that the Clinton camp takes the position that the delegates will count.

If he's the nominee because Florida didn't get seated and so he won on "delegates", but essentially lost the popular vote, I fear the Democratic party really will tear itself to shreds.  Fortunately, I think that has little chance of happening.

And, yes, I do think Clinton's calling for their seating is driven in part by the fact that she's likely to win.  But I do think it was smart for her to call for it before the primary and not just because it's a way to appeal to Floridians, but because she did it when she doesn't know how the vote or delegates would break down.  Polls have been wrong this year.  And I think she has a good argument for not doing it earlier - it would've completely undermined the DNC.  It still undermines them, but not nearly as much as it would've had she done it right after Dean announced the punishment.  

We don't know if there will be any delegates involved, but saying that the result won't mean anything is ridiculous.

And that's a strong argument to make for Clinton. If the Obama campaign tries to poo-poo the result, they can say "I guess Obama is saying that the votes of 100s of thousands of Floridans are meaningless to him".

Or, to draw another contrast: "I guess to Obama the endorsement of a few people are more important than the votes of 100s of thousands of Democratic voters." (I'd go for this one, it puts Clinton at the side of the people, vs. Obama the glamourous establishment candidate)

New Hampshire voters, you were played for suckers.
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Hillary's+word:+It's+worth+nothing&articleId=08 53268a-d982-4190-81e8-740ae942f510

Journalists right now are just salivating and waiting for an opportunity to report that he said something "bad" again.

Well, have him say that "the Obama campaign are saying that the Florida results didn't matter. Well, I don't know if they will get their delegates, but I think that it's very elitist and disrespectful to several 100,000 voters to tell them that their votes don't matter."

You bet it would be reported.

I fault the party for not getting it's stuff together on any level throughout this whole process.  Good grief, why should the voters be punished simply because a bunch of wanna be pols at all levels can't settle their differences?